Tuesday 30 June 2015

Arkham Knight's First Ending Is Great, Its Second Is Bad, And Its Third Is Insane

arkham knight3
I recently just beat Arkham Knight, and by “beat,” I really do mean beat. That’s at least my definition of doing everything in an Arkham game except finding 200+ Riddler trophies, and in this case that’s taking down every watchtower, blowing up every mine, and catching every one of Gotham’s rogues in and out of the main storyline. I ended the game with ~95% completion, and that’s more than enough to set off the game’s chain reaction of endings.
Obviously we’re going to start veering into heavy spoiler territory soon here, but before we begin I want to clarify something. My title may suggest the game has an A/B/C ending made famous by Mass Effect 3, and to a less controversial extent, Deus Ex: Human Revolution. But it is not a multiple choice ending like those games, which launches you into an expository cutscene about what may or may not have happened to the Batman after the events of the game depending on one final choice you make. Rather, it’s a three stage ending, meaning everyone has the same one, but you’ll only unlock different pieces of it if you complete enough of the game.
But if you haven’t finished, stop reading now, and come back and see me once you’ve beaten it, by whatever definition you want to use.
(ENDING SPOILERS FOLLOW)
The first and most obvious ending of Arkham Knight, the story ending, is bound to be controversial in its own right. The entire game is focused on a pair of villains, the familiar Scarecrow and the unfamiliar Arkham Knight, an armored Batman clone who has no problem using firearms and commands a drone/merc army that swarms Gotham as Scarecrow devises his plan to drown everyone in fear gas for the millionth time
Watch below to see when Call of Duty may return to World War I
For the duration of the game, the Arkham Knight’s identity is a big mystery to everyone, Batman included, and no amount of Alfred’s research turns up anything even resembling a clue as to who he may be. Ahead of launch, Rocksteady promised the Arkham Knight was a wholly original creation they cooked up in collaboration DC, so that had fans excited about the potential of the reveal.
As it turns out, they weren’t being entirely truthful. During a main mission about two-thirds of the way through the story, the in-my-head Joker taunted Batman by showing him an elaborate flashback about when he executed Jason Todd, Batman’s second Robin. At that point, I knew where things were headed, and I wasn’t wrong.

Joker’s hallucination would have been a big enough clue on its own, but I, like many Batman fans, am familiar with Under the Red Hood, a Batman story that has Jason Todd killed by the Joker (as occurred in a previous story, Death in the Family) and return from the grave to wreak havoc on both Batman and the Gotham underworld. There too, his identity is a mystery until it’s revealed that Ra’s al Ghul resurrected Todd in a Lazarus Pit, but it didn’t take and he went insane. He tries to kill Joker who murdered him the first time, and also has it in for Batman for leaving him to die. There’s also a variant of this tale told in the more recent Hush story, where Todd is a fake-out for another masked villain (who weirdly also shows up in Arkham Knight).
red hood
The Arkham Knight is a twisted variant of the Red Hood. Joker reveals that he simply brainwashed Todd and didn’t kill him, and in the game, Todd wants quite literally nothing but to see Batman suffer and eventually die. In their climactic battle, Batman rips off his faux-bat mask to reveal a sub-helmet that looks quite a bit like the Red Hood mask, and obvious nod from Rocksteady. Batman convinces Todd he can be redeemed, and he intervenes to help later in the game after Scarecrow unmasks Batman as Bruce Wayne for the world to see.
As a self-contained story, infusing Under the Red Hood with Rocksteady’s universe works really well. The entire game is about Batman pushing away his friends when they try to help him because he deems it too dangerous. At one point he literally locks the current Robin (Tim Drake) in a cell to prevent him from trying to take on Scarecrow, and so his rival turning out to be the Robin he let die is more than a little appropriate. Honestly, I might even like this telling of the Red Hood tale more than the original.
With that said, I understand why many avid Batman fans may consider it a letdown, given that they were promised a new character, and this is essentially a renamed and recostumed version of a character that has already existed for years, and most will spot the twist from a mile away as a result. It works within the game, but it was more than a little deceptive for Rocksteady to insist his identity would shock and amaze us all. I almost wish they made the Arkham Knight Talia al Ghul, which was a theory I had early on.
So that’s the first ending. Todd switches sides and disappears, Scarecrow is injected with his own toxin because that always has to happen, and Batman is outed as Bruce Wayne. There’s also a fun little sequence where you play as the Joker inside Batman’s toxin-addled head, where you lock him away to be forgotten, his worst fear now that he’s dead.
The story concludes there, and Batman returns to Gotham to finish cleaning up the streets even if the main villains have been put down. It’s here you’re told about something called the “Knightfall Protocol,” where after you put away enough of Gotham’s Most Wanted (read: complete side-quest chains), you can activate it and it does…something, the specifics of which are never made clear until you press the button.
For Video Game Fanboys
I ended up doing everything I could except finding all the Riddler trophies after I freed Catwoman. That meant taking down Harvey Dent, Penguin, Firefly, Man-Bat and a host of others, including Deathstroke who is brought in to replace Todd’s Arkham Knight once he goes AWOL, which was actually one of my favorite parts about the end of the game (though I hated that the final battle against the assassin is yet another tank war).

So what is the “Knightfall Protocol?” Now that the world knows Batman is Bruce Wayne, he says he has to give up being Batman for reasons that don’t really make much sense to me. It’s not as if everyone he knew wasn’t in danger already, and I’m having a hard time understanding why he has to hang up the cowl as it really doesn’t seem like that big of a deal. If Tony Stark can do it, why can’t he?

But he doesn’t just “hang up the cowl,” he lands on his mansion’s lawn in the Batwing, walks inside where he’s greeted by Alfred, and the entire place explodes, leaving the crowds gathered outside gasping in horror. “And this is how the Batman died,” says the Jim Gordon voiceover you heard in the beginning of the game, and the credits roll.
arkham knight4

The game tries to act like one of Gotham’s villains blew up the mansion or Bruce Wayne committed suicide, but it’s pretty obvious he faked his own death and didn’t actually self-destruct himself and his butler, but what then? If Batman comes back, everyone’s going to think “well Bruce Wayne faked his death,” not “well I guess someone else is Batman now.” This is kind of the ending we saw in Chris Nolan’s The Dark Knight Rises, and it didn’t make much sense there either, as we see Bruce strutting around overseas where anyone can recognize one of the world’s richest men when he’s supposedly dead.
I really hate this ending, and wish I’d just hung out on a rooftop and turned my game off instead of firing up the Knightfall Protocol. Yes, this isn’t the first time a hero’s faked his death, but in the context of the game we just finished, it makes no sense. He just…really, really likes his privacy? I get that all the criminals are now locked up, but they always escape, so why do this? It would have made at least a little more sense for him to jet to some island somewhere and have Nightwing, Robin and Oracle policing the city, as he’s finally confident enough in his team to leave Gotham entirely in their hands. That would have been in keeping with the theme of the storyline.
So naturally, when the game informed me about a “true” Knightfall ending after I’d finished finding all Riddler’s goodies and got that magical 100%, I figured the existing ending would be rectified. Instead, (as I discovered via YouTube), it just gets stranger, and is probably the biggest enduring mystery of the game.
The “real” ending features a lengthy cutscene of Gordon musing about Gotham without Batman, and eventually we see two robbers attacking a man and a woman in an alley, who are stand-ins for Thomas and Martha Wayne, obviously. The robbers see a shadow on a building, and yell that Batman’s dead and they’re not afraid any more.
arkham knight5
Rather than swoop down and prove them wrong, the shadow elongates, then explodes into a fiery bat demon shape, and the robbers scream in terror. It’s something straight out a Scarecrow toxin-dream.

It’s a purposefully ambiguous ending, which is somewhat expected as Rocksteady doesn’t seem like they’ll come back to this series any time soon. Either Wayne returned as Batman and the robbers were simply seeing manifestations of their own fears of the caped crusader, or someone, either Wayne or a new player, is actually using Scarecrow fear toxin to control the criminal population. A worrying thought.
I’m not sure I’ve seen a game end quite so elaborately. I think many players will likely push the button to activate “Knightfall,” as it just hangs in front of you like a mystery, but I don’t think most will be satisfied by the clearly fake Wayne death ending. And if they do get to 100%, I don’t think they’ll know what to think.
Honestly, the final two stages of the ending aren’t really necessary, and could have been handled better if they did need to exist. The Dark Knight Rising’s ending was a bit nonsensical, but the torch passing to Thomas Blake was a little more satisfying of a conclusion than…whatever it is we see here. But up until that point, I think the Arkham Knight/Red Hood storyline was told quite well, even if it wasn’t the mind-blowing surprise that was promised.
What did you make of the ending, whichever one you’ve gotten to?






How Big Data Is Transforming The Fight Against Cancer

When we talk about Big Data, we often talk about it in terms of business, and in particular how it can be used to generate money. But it’s important to remember that the possibilities go way further. Science has the task of expanding humanity’s horizons–whether that’s by exploring space or discovering more about the tiny organisms that make up the natural world. From the start, data has played a role in this. But in the age of Big Data–the field which has emerged thanks to the explosion in the amount of data we create and capture, and the advanced computer analysis that has become possible in recent years–it’s more important than ever.
The fight against cancer is the search for the Holy Grail of medicine. Almost everyone will be affected at some point in their lives, either personally or by proxy through a loved one. So it’s no surprise that Big Data is being put to use in many ways to aid the task of improving care, identifying risks and hopefully eventually producing cures.
One such project is the American Society for Clinical Oncology’s CancerLinQinitiative, which aims to collate data from every cancer patient in the US and make it available for analysis in the hope that it will reveal patterns that lead to new insights.
These could be useful for doctors providing treatment–accessing up-to-date information on how thousands of others have reacted to a proposed treatment plan will enable them to tailor treatments to individual patients and provide the best chance of a positive outcome.
Cancer researcher at Cambridge Cancer Research Centre (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images/Cancer Research UK)
AI-Driven Diagnosis
It was recently announced that 14 cancer institutes across the United States and Canada would be using IBM IBM -0.29%’s Watson analytics engine to match cancer patients with the treatments most likely to help them.
As well as recommending the relevant cancer drug most likely to treat a particular patient’s cancer, Watson can even recommend drugs that have not been used to treat cancer before. Since it is programmed with specific details of how thousands of medicines interact with the human body, Watson can suggest anything which it thinks might interact beneficially with the cell affected by mutation which is causing the cancer. Of course, a doctor will probably have to take many other issues into consideration before prescribing whatever the AI-driven Watson suggests, but it surely will speed up the process.

Sweet Briar College, San Diego State University On Top For #MyTopCollege First Week

We are one week in to Forbes’ second annual #MyTopCollege movement, and we can report that we’ve received submissions from every region of the U.S. Launched last Monday, the campaign through our new  account allows students to share how their school has uniquely helped them grow as individuals and professionals. Last year, we saw over 35,000 tweets and 8,000 Instagram posts – and after just one week, we are well on our way to surpassing those amounts this year.
Regionally, the Appalachian Highlands (which include KY, TN, WV, VA and NC) overwhelmingly lead the scoreboard, with the Pacific and Midwest coming in next. We have not received many submissions from the Heartland (hello, ND, SD, NE, KS, MN, IA and MO, we’re talking to you), but submissions from our other regions have been hearty.
MAP

Far in first place is Virginia’s Sweet Briar College, the 114-year-old small all-women’s liberal arts school that recently almost closed. It was rescued at the last minute with a court ruling and new president, Phil Stone. Students proved on social media with over 600 submissions that their spirit is still alive and kicking.
sweet briar
Taking the next two spots are both west coast schools. San Diego State University comes in second, and in third is last year’s winner, California State University at Fullerton.
sdsu

Following, the Mountain region is led by Colorado State University. There has been generous representation from Idaho, as the College of Idaho and University of Idaho compete for the next top regional spot.
colstate
The New England region is headed by the University of New Hampshire, who was also a frontrunner in last year’s campaign. Regional Ivy rivals such asHarvard and Yale have yet to post anything, and we would love to hear from more Ivy Leagues.

unh
Leading the Midwest are the Michigan State University Spartans. Though Saginaw Valley State University generated good steam to start by offering campus bookstore gift cards, they are currently lagging behind other schools in the Michigan region. Iowa schools are also vying for representation, as we will see if Central College or the University of Iowa pulls ahead next week.
msu
Leading the southwest is Texas Christian University, and Mississippi State University leads the southeast. Finally, in the Mid-Atlantic region, St. Lawrence University in New York heads the pack. Close behind are Pennsylvania schools Delaware Valley University and Villanova University.
BINGHAMTON

Instead of simply scenic campus shots, students have been posting personal photos of friends and student life, as well as stories of inspiration and success. So far, we have wide representation from large state universities and small liberal arts colleges. However, institutions that usually brim with mass school spirit are much quieter this year, like sports rivals University of Michigan and Ohio State University.
Please continue to tweet and Instagram pictures of how your school has uniquely shaped you with the hashtag #MyTopCollege and your school’s Twitter handle. There’s only 5 weeks until the July 29 deadline and the chance to be featured on Forbes’ website and social media – so go, go, go!

SelfieWithDaughter: Ehsan Jafri’s daughter shares ‘haunting’ picture for Narendra Modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his recent ‘Mann Ki Baat’ programme asked people to share selfies with their daughters using hashtag #SelfieWithDaughter. The #SelfieWithDaughter initiative was a part of campaign against female infanticide. With people’s active participation in the campaign, the hashtag was trending among top trends on micro-blogging website Twitter. But there were dissenting voices too against the initiative.
SelfieWithDaughter: This one will haunt him for ever..
Nishrin Jafri Hussain, daughter of Ehsan Jafri who was killed in Gujarat riots in 2002, shared a picture with her late father, along with a hard-hitting caption. It read: “SelfieWithDaughter: This one will  haunt him for ever.”
Ehsan Jafri was a former MP of the Congress party, who was murdered in the infamous Gulbarg society massacre in 2002 where 69 Muslims were mercilessly killed by a riotous Hindu mob. The horrific incident and communal riots happened when Narendra Modi was the Chief Minister of the Gujarat. Ehsan Jafri’s widow Zakia Jafri accused Gujarat police and the then CM Modi of turning a blind eye to the riotous mob, which finally led to the death his husband and other Muslims. (Read also: #SelfieWithDaughter: Shruti Seth faces Twitter wrath for criticising PM Narendra Modi)

Zarine Khan: Definition of bold has changed

Zarine Khan: Definition of bold has changed
Zarine  Khan
Actress Zarine Khan, all set to go bold in the third instalment of Bollywood's erotic franchise 'Hate Story', knows she'd have to shoot lovemaking scenes, but she has no inhibitions.

"The definition of bold has changed today. Almost every film these days has a lovemaking scene and they are acceptable without being termed bold. Everyone is doing it. I think it stands out in my case because the franchise has the tag of being 'erotica'.

READ: Zarine Khan: Comfortable doing bold or intimate scenes

"But honestly, if I was to do a film without lovemaking or kissing I will end up doing only mythological movies," said the Veer and Readyactress.

She says her family is very supportive of her thoughts too.

"My mom is very supportive and if my family and my close friends are with me, I donA't care a damn what anyone else says about me or my image," she added.

For latest Bollywood updates, follow us on Twitter >>>@TOIEntertain

For the latest in Bollywood news, like us on Facebook >>>TOIEntertain

For more interesting Bollywood news and pictures, follow us on Pinterest>>> timesofindia

Listen to Veer songs on Gaana.com

WATCH: Zareen Khan is comfortable with intimate scenes


Russell Brand couldn’t make the city LOL

Russell Brand couldn’t make the city LOL
Comedy Central Chuckle Festival 2015 dubbed the 'Russell Brand Live in India' show as 'World-Class Laughter. Now in India.' (The unnecessary splitting of the sentence should have been warning enough). They promised June 27 'to be the funniest day of your life'. People believed. And shelled out between Rs.4000 to Rs.2000 to LOL with Brand - the English comedian, actor, radio host, author, and activist, but most popularly known as singer Katy Perry's 'ex'. And so, 2000 people packed into the White Orchid Convention Centre chuckling in anticipation. 

The chuckles turned into guffaws as Vir Das warmed up the stage for Brand. He really 'rofl-ed' them with his jokes. He did such a good job of it that even half-an-act from Brand could've had the audience laughing their asses off. But somehow Brand didn't cut it that evening. 

Dressed in a sleeveless tee with an imprint of Lord Krishna on it, Brand began well — he walked off the stage, interacted with the audience, sitting amongst them and joking. And the audience — patrons of solpa-adjust-maadi philosophy — thought Brand was laying the foundation for an evening of 'avant-garde' experimental performance'. 

Now if only the audience had read what Sean Howlett, commentator and columnist had to say about Brand, they wouldn't have been so hopeful after all. "In my humble opinion Russell Brand is not a funny man. His jokes are childish and boring. Brand tries to sound like an intellectual yet he's merely a stupid person's idea of a clever person."(Sean Howlett in Huffingtonpost). As the evening progressed, with decreasing laughs, Howlett seemed to have hit the bull's eye. 

"The media always interprets me wrongly. In an interview when they asked me what advice I would give to young pop stars. I thought it was a joke question and so I looked in my head for a joke answer and I must add that my head is not always my ally. I said 'Pop stars should take heroin. Most of the musicians I like did and it will also kill off the weak ones.'" No wonder, UK Prime Minister David Cameron called Brand a "comic with a beard who thinks terrorism is funny" and he is not even funny. 

What did Brand take that evening that it killed his thinking brain? Here's a Brand joke: "As a representative of the global community, a visitor from abroad, I don't want to come across a little bit biased, but could I please ask of you, people of America, please elect Barack Obama, please, on behalf of the world. Some people, I think they're called racists, say America is not ready for a black President. But I know America to be a forward-thinking country because otherwise why would you have let that retard and cowboy fella be President for eight years?" Yo Brand, even Obama's term is coming to an end (he legalised gay marriages in conservative Amrika, remember?) 

Brand admitted, on stage, that he was performing jokes he had written for the MTV VMAs which he hosted in 2008. So, now we are a dumping ground for not just used electronic goods of the west, but also bad outdated jokes? The chuckles were now a trickle. And by the time he began reading twitter reactions to his 'old jokes' from a piece of crumpled paper, Brand had lost the crowd. 

Maybe Howlette's observation will help the audience to understand why Brand wasn't particularly funny that night. Howlette wrote: Brand's recent foray into political activism has shown this wannabe modern-day Lord Byron for what he truly is; shallow, stupid and lacking in self-awareness to such a degree it's cringeworthy. In many ways, he seems to be narcissistic and immature — like a child who hasn't yet come to terms with his/her limitations (Huffingtonpost). 

Shreanca Bhattacharjee, an artist and event organiser who had come to watch the show with her friends says: "He started off well but then it lacked continuity, it looked like he was a little zoned out while narrating a story about when he met the Queen with James Blunt. That confused the audience; I mean I wasn't sure what was happening." 

There are limits to even what an accommodating, but confused, audience can do with a bearded man (with an alleged Messiah-complex) on stage trying to crack jokes that just wouldn't crack. Sensing it, Brand stared silently at the audience before trying a different approach. He pointed to a row of people wearing t-shirts with an artwork of him on it. "I'm a narcissist," he admitted, "but this is too much for even me." Should we or shouldn't we...laugh that is...the audience was in a conundrum. But one should give it to Brand — the man didn't give up easily. Every time he failed to garner a laugh, he'd come back to the t-shirts for a chuckle. "On my t-shirt I have Lord Krishna and yours you have me. I don't know what to make of it," he remarked. 

At some point the men in the front row might've wanted to discard the t-shirts and go back home half-naked. His interest in spirituality, his tattoos and ranting about the evils of capitalism left the audience clueless and finally completely laugh-less. 

Finally, Brand ended the hour long performance with a Q&A with the audience. Hearing the questions (Who are you getting married to? Will you come to the temple with me? Will you marry me?), it seemed like a little bit of Brand must've rubbed off on the audience leaving them bland. Brand, funnily (ah, surprise!) laughed them off by saying "it would be nice to have a polygamous Indian family." In the end, good sense prevailed upon Brand and he said: "If there aren't any more questions we'll end the show now". Thank God he didn't hear some in the audience remark...: "Now we know why Katy Perry left him." Or "This is the best satsang I have ever attended." But this one got the best laugh even from strangers: "I got to watch the show for free, but I still want my money back." 

The lone voice 

"It was exactly what I was expecting it to be. There are a few people on the planet who make sense when they speak about stuff that matters. Brand happens to be an unlikely choice but he makes a ton of sense. And he has the guts to come on a show sponsored by Fosters and praise Vijay Mallya (when going through a checklist of things that would work with a Bengalurean audience he said "I've been told we should thank Vijay Mallya") . I actually think the audiences here aren't mature enough to understand his style of humour." 

Aniket Dasgupta — Filmmaker 


Vox Pop 

"When he was on stage talking about Hinduism and chanting sholkas and khalsas I wasn't quite sure if was being serious or poking fun of it. He lost me there entirely. I don't know if Indian audiences are prepared for British humour which isn't easy to chew." 

— Shunky Chugani 

"For us comics who are exposed to comedy, foreign acts Louis CK and Bill Burr are more appealing and Brand pails in comparison. For an average audience, they don't have the exposure to comprehend him. But it is up to Indian comics to expose and warm Indian audiences to different forms of comedy. Maybe a few years down the line his act wouldn't have seemed that bad to the audience." 

— Rupen Paul 

"The Indian audience will connect to Indian acts better. Sanjay got more laughs in ten minutes of stage time than Brand did in an hour and that says something." 

— Kritarth Srinivasan 

"Watching Russell Brand on stage was one of the most painful experience of my life. A friend of mine had bought the tickets and I went because Vir Das was performing and he was great. But Brand was terrible. I wouldn't watch him on stage again if they paid me to. He had put in no preparation into the show at all. I was so dismayed that I even tweeted my views to him." 

— Nikhil Sahani 

"I travelled all the way from Chennai to watch the show. He was preachy as I was expecting him to be, which is amusing but he could have been a lot funnier." 

— Zaid Khan 

"He was certainly not at his best. He has a unique and niche style but he didn't bring his A-game that night." 

—Sundeep Rao 


Who gets your laugh 

"There is no pressure on me to do well because in the end a white guy will finish the show." "Men have nipples just to remind us that we don't have breasts" 

—Vir Das 

"I don't watch porn. Not because I don't want to but because I have a BSNL internet connection." 

— Sanjay Manaktala 

"As a white man I'm trying to sell Hinduism to a country that has already had it for thousands of years and know more about it" 

— Russell Brand 

EU says Greek controls should be for 'shortest possible period'


[BRUSSELS] Greece's capital controls should remain in place for the "shortest possible period," European Commission Financial-Services Commissioner Jonathan Hill said.
"While the imposed restrictive measures appear necessary and proportionate at this time, the free movement of capital will however need to be reinstated as soon as possible in the interest of the Greek economy, the euro zone, and the European Union's single market as a whole," Mr Hill said Monday in a statement.
The Brussels-based European Commission said Greece's capital controls are in line with EU law and treaties. Temporary controls appear justified as a matter of "overriding public interest," Mr Hill said.
"Maintaining financial stability is the main and immediate challenge for the country," Mr Hill said. He said the commission would monitor developments closely and stands ready to help the Greek authorities with technical work.


Greece also can restart negotiations on the bailout deal, which have been suspended since Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras called on Friday for a referendum, EU Economic Affairs Commissioner Pierre Moscovici said. He said Greece and its creditors are "a few centimeters from a deal" and he hopes to move past the impasse.
"The door is open to negotiations," Mr Moscovici said on Twitter. "Greece is a member of the euro zone. It should stay there."

Congress candidate KS Sabarinadhan wins Kerala bypoll elections with a margin of 10,000 votes

Thiruvananthapuram: In a shot in the arm for the Congress-led UDF government in Kerala ahead of Assembly polls next year, KS Sabarinadhan on Tuesday won the Aruvikkara bypoll with a margin of 10,128 votes defeating his nearest rival M Vijayakumar of the LDF spearheaded by CPI-M.
K. A Sabarinathan. Screengrab from Youtube.
K. A Sabarinathan. Screengrab from Youtube.
A beaming Chief Minister Oommen Chandy said the victory was a clear pointer to UDF coming to power in the next elections, creating history in a state which elects
governments alternating between UDF and LDF.
Attacking the CPI(M), Chandy said the party had insulted the electorate by alleging that the UDF had earned the victory by splurging money earned through corrupt deals and liquor.
Earlier, a sombre opposition leader, VS Achuthanandan, alleged that UDF victory was due to appeasement of minority, which the BJP had taken advantage of. UDF had made several crores of rupees through corrupt deals, he alleged and it was spent at Aruvikkara.
Sabarinadhan polled 56,448 votes, while Vijayakumar, a former speaker and ex-state minister could get only 46,320 votes and BJP candidate and former Union Minister O Rajagopal 34,145 votes in the fierce triangular contest.
The 33-year-old Congress candidate had maintained the lead throughout during the counting, while CPI-M and BJP were neck and neck vying for the second spot.
Sabarinadhan, son of former speaker G Karthikeyan, whose death in February last year necessitated the bypoll, is an engineering graduate and MBA degree holder. He joined politics after quitting the post of a senior executive with a multinational company.
The poll result is considered to be a litmus test for both the rival fronts and BJP as civic elections are due this year end and assembly polls next year.
The outcome is a big relief for the four-year-old UDF government as the opposition had used every opportunity to corner the government on the solar and bar bribery scams.
The left front had also tried to prevent Finance Minister, KM Mani, facing bar bribery charges, from presenting the state budget on 13 March leading to unprecedented violence and mayhem in the House.
Reacting to the victory, Kerala PCC President, VM Sudheeran, said the poll outcome would strengthen the UDF and the government and that the voters had rejected opposition's 'false' allegations.
G Karthikeyan had represented the segment during the last five times in the Assembly.
For UDF government, that came to power with a wafer thin majority of two MLAs in 2011 riding on the slogan of 'development and care, the result is widely considered as a referendum on the performance of the government.
With this result, the constituency, which has women outnumbering men, seems to have also given the thumbs up to government's decision to close down over 700 liquor bars in the state as part of the new liquor policy.
According to political observers, the outcome is a serious setback to LDF which had slammed the Chandy government on corruption allegations.
This is also a third drubbing to the left front in the bypolls since 2012, after UDF came to power a year ago. In the earlier two bypolls held at Pirvaom and Neyatinkkara, UDF candidates had emerged victorious.
The result is also seen as a huge blow to former CPI(M) state secretary Pinarayi Vijayan, in-charge of the campaign at Aruvikkara, as he is tipped to be Chief Ministerial candidate, if LDF comes to power after assembly polls to be held next year.
92-year-old Achuthanandan, who was the star campaigner for the LDF and drew large crowds, also could not make much inroads into the UDF vote bank.
The result is also an embarrassment for CPI-M, which had put up its own candidate in the constituency after nearly two decades. Earlier, its former front partner, RSP, had contested
the seat.
The increasing vote bank of BJP, is giving heartburn to the CPI-M as the vote erosion is mainly from its kitty, the observers said.
As far as the BJP is concerned, even though the lotus failed to bloom, Rajagopal, had managed to increase the party's voting percentage significantly giving a tough fight to CPI(M).
The result is also considered very crucial for Congress and especially for Chandy. A defeat for Congress would have strengthened the move by a section in the party for a leadership change as part of 'image built up of the government'.
Another political significant factor is that the bypoll was held in the wake of changes in partners of UDF and LDF. SP had joined forces with UDF in the Lok Sabha polls while KC-B member Ganesh Kumar had left the ruling front.
The poll results also dealt a big slap to former government Chief Whip and dissident Kerala Congress (M) MLA P C George, who was instrumental in putting up an Anti-Corruption Front candidate, much to the discomfort of his party and UDF.
With this win, UDF will have 74 members, and LDF 65 in the 140 member assembly in which Ganesh Kumar, lone MLA of Kerala Congress (B) keeping both the fronts at bay.